Method of processing positioning data

ABSTRACT

A method of creating map data is disclosed, the map data including a plurality of navigable segments representing segments of a navigable route in the area covered by the map with each segment being arranged to have speed data associated therewith. In at least one embodiment, the method includes processing speed data relating to a plurality of the segments of the navigable route covered by the map to generate a set of generated speed profiles, with each generated speed profile within the set being an approximation to traffic speed along one or more of the segments of the navigable route and each speed profile varying with respect to time; and associating at least one speed profile from the set with a navigable segment within the map data.

This application is a National Phase entry of PCT Application numberPCT/EP2008/064323 filed on Oct. 22, 2008, which claims under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), 120 and 365(c) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/996,050,filed on Oct. 26, 2007 and 60/996,052, filed on Oct. 26, 2007.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a method of processing positioning data and inparticular to processing positioning data in order to generate map dataarranged to be used in navigation devices and in particular, but notespecially in a Portable Navigation Device (PND). The invention alsoprovides related apparatus for providing the method.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Map data for electronic navigation devices, such as GPS based personalnavigation devices like the GO™ from TomTom International BV, comes fromspecialist map vendors such as Tele Atlas NV. Such devices are alsoreferred to as Portable Navigation Devices (PND's). This map data isspecially designed to be used by route guidance algorithms, typicallyusing location data from the GPS system. For example, roads can bedescribed as lines—i.e. vectors (e.g. start point, end point, directionfor a road, with an entire road being made up of many hundreds of suchsegments, each uniquely defined by start point/end point directionparameters). A map is then a set of such road vectors, data associatedwith each vector (speed limit; travel direction, etc.) plus points ofinterest (POIs), plus road names, plus other geographic features likepark boundaries, river boundaries, etc., all of which are defined interms of vectors. All map features (e.g. road vectors, POIs etc.) aretypically defined in a co-ordinate system that corresponds with orrelates to the GPS co-ordinate system, enabling a device's position asdetermined through a GPS system to be located onto the relevant roadshown in a map and for an optimal route to be planned to a destination.

To construct this map database, Tele Atlas starts with basic roadinformation from various sources, such as the Ordnance Survey for roadsin England. It also has a large, dedicated team of vehicles driving onroads, plus personnel checking other maps and aerial photographs, toupdate and check its data. This data constitutes the core of the TeleAtlas map database. This map database is being continuously enhancedwith geo-referenced data. It is then checked and published four times ayear to device manufacturers like TomTom.

Each such road segment has associated therewith a speed data for thatroad segment which gives an indication of the speed at which a vehiclecan travel along that segment and is an average speed generated by theparty that produced the map data, which may be, for example, Tele Atlas.The speed data is used by route planning algorithms on PND's on whichthe map is processed. The accuracy of such route planning thus dependson the accuracy of the speed data. For example, a user is oftenpresented with an option on his/her PND to have it generate the fastestroute between the current location of the device and a destination. Theroute calculated by the PND may well not be the fastest route if thespeed data is inaccurate.

It is known that parameters such as density of traffic can significantlyeffect the speed profile of a segment of road and such speed profilevariations mean that the quickest route between two points may notremain the same. Inaccuracies in the speed parameter of a road segmentcan also lead to inaccurate Estimated Times of Arrival (ETA) as well asselection of a sub-optimal quickest route.

Tele Atlas have developed a system in which GPS data is uploaded fromPND's and used to provide speed parameters for segments of the map datawhich aims to provide speed parameters which show the true speed on aroad segment at predetermined times of a day.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a methodof creating map data, the map data comprising a plurality of navigablesegments representing segments of a navigable route in the area coveredby the map with each segment being arranged to have speed dataassociated therewith, the method comprising the following steps:

i. processing speed data relating to a plurality of the segments of thenavigable route covered by the map to generate a set of generated speedprofiles, with each generated speed profile within the set being anapproximation to traffic speed along one or more of the segments of thenavigable route and each speed profile varying with respect to time; and

ii. associating at least one speed profile from the set with a navigablesegment within the map data.

Such a method is advantageous because it may allow devices processingthe map data to provide more accurate routes since each speed profilewithin the set is an approximation to traffic speed along a segment. Assuch, devices processing the map data in order to generate a route maybe able to refer to one or more of the speed profiles in order to obtainbetter speed data when compared to the prior art.

The navigable segments generally represent segments of a road but mayalso represent segments of any other path, channel or the like navigableby a vehicle, person or the like. For example, a navigable segment mayrepresent a segment of a path, river, canal, cycle path, tow path, railway line, or the like. Thus, it will be appreciated that reference totraffic is not necessarily limited to vehicles moving along a roadsegment but be relate to any movement along a navigable segment. Forexample, traffic may refer to bikes moving along a cycle path.

The method may comprise an initial step of capturing positioning datawhich comprises a plurality of positions. Generally, each position willalso be associated with a time at which the position occurred. Suchpositioning data may typically comprise data providing a plurality ofpositions and time stamps at which those positions occurred. Suchcapture of positioning data may be by way of uploading positioning datafrom at least one, and generally a plurality, of Navigation Devices,which may in particular be Portable Navigation Devices (PND's). In sucha method the uploaded positioning data from the PND's may be stored forprocessing in the steps of the method. The skilled person willappreciate that basing data on a plurality of devices is likely toresult in speed data that more closely relates to actual conditions onthe navigable segment.

Conveniently, the positioning data is processed in order to generate thespeed data associated with one or more navigable segments. Such a methodis believed advantageous since it allows the speed data to reflect therecorded speeds on a navigable segment rather than assuming that thespeed at which traffic flows along a segment is a speed limit, or otheraverage, associated with that segment. As such, PND's, or other devices,using the map data should be able to produce more accurate routeplanning.

The method may comprise dividing the positioning data into a pluralityof traces, with each trace representing positioning data received from anavigation device over a predetermined period. In one embodiment, thispredetermined period may be roughly 24 hours, which may correspond to acalendar day.

The captured positioning data, which may in particular mean each trace,may be processed in order to generate trip data representing anindividual journey for a navigation device. A journey may be thought ofas a period in which the navigation device was in motion withoutstopping for more than a predetermined time. Dividing the position datainto trip data may be advantageous since it can increase accuracy withinthe set of speed profiles since periods in which the navigation deviceis stationary may be discounted.

The positioning data may be processed in order to remove inaccuratepositions.

The positioning data may be processed in order to associate positionswithin that data with a navigable segment. Subsequently, speed data maybe determined from the positioning data and the navigable segment withwhich a position has been associated.

So generated speed data may be categorised into one of a plurality ofpredetermined time periods for the navigable segment with which theyhave been associated.

Subsequently, the method may average the speeds within each of thepredetermined time periods for each navigable segment. As such, themethod may generate a measured speed profile, with each predeterminedtime period providing a point on the measured speed profile. This may berepeated for a plurality of navigable segments and generally for eachnavigable segment for which there is sufficient positioning data. Thus,navigable segments with insufficient data, or poor quality data, may nothave a measured speed profile generated.

The method may comprise modifying the measured speed profile to replacea portion thereof with modified values for the speed averages for one ormore predetermined times. Such modification may be performed before,during or after creation of the measured speed profile. Conveniently,the modified values comprise an average of the speed averages for eachof the predetermined times within the replace portion. The replacedportion may comprise predetermined times falling within a night timeperiod. The average of the speed averages may be thought of as a freeflow speed; an approximation of the speed at which a vehicle may travelalong the navigable segment when that segment is clear of traffic.

The method may further comprise processing the measured speed profilesin order to generate the generated speed profiles therefrom, whereineach generated speed profile may typically provide an approximation toone or more of the measured speed profiles.

Generation of the generated speed profiles may be by way of performing aclustering algorithm on the measured speed profiles, which may be the kmeans clustering algorithm.

Generally, the set of generated speed profiles are checked to ascertainthat a generated speed profile does not contain and discontinuitiesand/or that each of the generated speed profiles is sufficientlydifferent from each of the others.

In some embodiments, the measured speed profiles may be normalised usinga normalisation criteria before the generated speed profiles aregenerated. Such a step may allow for further reduction in the size ofthe generated map data since any one generated speed profile may bemapped, using a reference, regardless of the speed of the measured speedprofile.

The free flow speed may used to normalise the measured speed profiles.Such a method may also result in higher data compression within thecreated map data since the traffic flow along a navigable segment may bespecified by reference to one of the generated speed profiles togetherwith the normalisation criteria.

The method may further comprise adding a flat line to the set ofgenerated speed profiles; ie a line representing an average speed thatdoes not vary with respect to time. Such a method is convenient becauseit can allow navigable segments for which there is insufficient data togenerate a measured speed profile to still have their speed profilespecified by reference to the set of generated speed profiles.

A final step of the method may be to generate a map being constituted bythe map data.

According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided amachine readable medium containing instructions which when read by amachine cause that machine to perform the method of the first aspect ofthe invention.

According to a third aspect of the invention there is provided map datacomprising a plurality of navigable segments representing segments of anavigable route in the area covered by the map with each segment beingarranged to have speed data associated therewith, the map data alsocomprising a set of generated speed profiles, with each generated speedprofile within the set being an approximation to traffic speed along oneor more segments of the navigable route, wherein the speed dataassociated with each segment comprises a reference to one of thegenerated speed profiles.

Such map data is believed convenient for a number of reasons includingan increased accuracy in the estimation of the speed at which a vehiclemay travel along a navigable segment together with a compression of thedata required for the map data. The compression is achieved due to theuse of the generated speed profiles with references thereto.

According to a fourth aspect of the invention there is provided amachine readable medium containing instructions which contain the mapdata of the third aspect of the invention.

According to a fifth aspect of the invention there is provided anavigation device comprising processing circuitry which includes amemory, the processing circuitry of the navigation device being arrangedto:

process map data held within the memory in order to generate a set ofrouting instructions to guide a user of the device; and

the memory being arranged to hold the map data which comprises at leastone set of generated speed profiles and a set of navigable segmentswherein each navigable segment has associated therewith a reference toat least one generated speed profile from the set of generated speedprofiles.

Such a navigation device may be advantageous since it may be able togenerate more accurate routing instructions when compared to prior artdevices, since the use of the set of generated speed profiles may allowthe speed data to more closely mirror traffic flow that is likely to beencountered on a road, etc. represented by a navigable segment.

The memory may also be arranged to hold a normalisation criteriaassociated with each navigable segment which the processing circuitry isarranged to use to scale the generated speed profile of use with thatnavigable segment. Such an arrangement may result in a reduction in thememory required since the set of generated speed profiles may beassociated with a navigable segment regardless of the average speedsencountered along that navigable segment.

According to a sixth aspect of the invention there is provided a machinereadable medium containing instructions which when read onto a machinecause that machine to function as the navigation device of the fifthaspect of the invention.

According to a seventh aspect of the invention there is provided Amachine arranged to process map data comprising a plurality of navigablesegments representing segments of a navigable route in the area coveredby the map with each segment being arranged to have speed dataassociated therewith, the machine being arranged to:

process speed data relating to a plurality of the segments of thenavigable route covered by the map data to generate a set of generatedspeed profiles, with each generated speed profile within the set beingan approximation to traffic speed along one or more of the segments ofthe navigable route and each speed profile varying with respect to time;and

associate at least one speed profile from the set with a navigablesegment within the map data.

According to an eighth aspect of the invention there is provided amachine readable data carrier holding instructions which when loadedonto a machine cause that machine to function as the machine of theseventh aspect of the invention.

In any of the above aspects of the invention the machine readable mediummay comprise any of the following: a floppy disk, a CD ROM, a DVDROM/RAM (including a −R/−RW and +R/+RW), a hard drive, a memory(including a USB memory key, an SD card, a Memorystick™, a compact flashcard, or the like), a tape, any other form of magneto optical storage, atransmitted signal (including an Internet download, an FTP transfer,etc), a wire, or any other suitable medium.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

At least one embodiment of the invention will now be described, by wayof example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an exemplary part of a GlobalPositioning System (GPS) usable by a navigation device;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a communications system forcommunication between a navigation device and a server;

FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of electronic components of thenavigation device of FIG. 2 or any other suitable navigation device;

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an arrangement of mounting and/ordocking a navigation device;

FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of an architectural stack employedby the navigation device of FIG. 3;

FIG. 6 shows a flowchart outlining an embodiment for matching GPS fixeswithin a trace to a map;

FIG. 7 shows a flowchart outlining an embodiment for generating anaverage;

FIG. 8 shows a flowchart outlining an embodiment for performing clusterformation on averages;

FIG. 9 shows an example set of cluster generated speed profiles whichare an output for the clustering algorithm;

FIG. 10 shows a flow chart outlining a fall back strategy used toimprove the quality of measured speed profiles associated with roadsegments;

FIG. 11 shows a flowchart outlining an embodiment of how the quality ofmeasured speed profile data is improved; and

FIG. 12 shows a flowchart outlining how the cluster generated speedprofiles are associated with road segments of at least one map;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION

Throughout the following description identical reference numerals willbe used to identify like parts.

Embodiments of the present invention will now be described withparticular reference to a Portable Navigation Device (PND). It should beremembered, however, that the teachings of the present invention are notlimited to PNDs but are instead universally applicable to any type ofprocessing device that is configured to execute navigation software in aportable manner so as to provide route planning and navigationfunctionality. It follows therefore that in the context of the presentapplication, a navigation device is intended to include (withoutlimitation) any type of route planning and navigation device,irrespective of whether that device is embodied as a PND, a vehicle suchas an automobile, or indeed a portable computing resource, for example aportable personal computer (PC), a mobile telephone or a PersonalDigital Assistant (PDA) executing route planning and navigationsoftware.

Further, embodiments of the present invention are described withreference to road segments. It should be realised that the invention mayalso be applicable to other navigable segments, such as segments of apath, river, canal, cycle path, tow path, rail way line, or the like.For ease of reference these are commonly referred to as a road segment.

It will also be apparent from the following that the teachings of thepresent invention even have utility in circumstances, where a user isnot seeking instructions on how to navigate from one point to another,but merely wishes to be provided with a view of a given location. Insuch circumstances the “destination” location selected by the user neednot have a corresponding start location from which the user wishes tostart navigating, and as a consequence references herein to the“destination” location or indeed to a “destination” view should not beinterpreted to mean that the generation of a route is essential, thattravelling to the “destination” must occur, or indeed that the presenceof a destination requires the designation of a corresponding startlocation.

With the above provisos in mind, the Global Positioning System (GPS) ofFIG. 1 and the like are used for a variety of purposes. In general, theGPS is a satellite-radio based navigation system capable of determiningcontinuous position, velocity, time, and in some instances directioninformation for an unlimited number of users. Formerly known as NAVSTAR,the GPS incorporates a plurality of satellites which orbit the earth inextremely precise orbits. Based on these precise orbits, GPS satellitescan relay their location, as GPS data, to any number of receiving units.However, it will be understood that Global Positioning systems could beused, such as GLOSNASS, the European Galileo positioning system, COMPASSpositioning system or IRNSS (Indian Regional Navigational SatelliteSystem).

The GPS system is implemented when a device, specially equipped toreceive GPS data, begins scanning radio frequencies for GPS satellitesignals. Upon receiving a radio signal from a GPS satellite, the devicedetermines the precise location of that satellite via one of a pluralityof different conventional methods. The device will continue scanning, inmost instances, for signals until it has acquired at least threedifferent satellite signals (noting that position is not normally, butcan be determined, with only two signals using other triangulationtechniques). Implementing geometric triangulation, the receiver utilizesthe three known positions to determine its own two-dimensional positionrelative to the satellites. This can be done in a known manner.Additionally, acquiring a fourth satellite signal allows the receivingdevice to calculate its three dimensional position by the samegeometrical calculation in a known manner. The position and velocitydata can be updated in real time on a continuous basis by an unlimitednumber of users.

As shown in FIG. 1, the GPS system 100 comprises a plurality ofsatellites 102 orbiting about the earth 104. A GPS receiver 106 receivesGPS data as spread spectrum GPS satellite data signals 108 from a numberof the plurality of satellites 102. The spread spectrum data signals 108are continuously transmitted from each satellite 102, the spreadspectrum data signals 108 transmitted each comprise a data streamincluding information identifying a particular satellite 102 from whichthe data stream originates. The GPS receiver 106 generally requiresspread spectrum data signals 108 from at least three satellites 102 inorder to be able to calculate a two-dimensional position. Receipt of afourth spread spectrum data signal enables the GPS receiver 106 tocalculate, using a known technique, a three-dimensional position.

Turning to FIG. 2, a navigation device 200 (ie a PND) comprising orcoupled to the GPS receiver device 106, is capable of establishing adata session, if required, with network hardware of a “mobile” ortelecommunications network via a mobile device (not shown), for examplea mobile telephone, PDA, and/or any device with mobile telephonetechnology, in order to establish a digital connection, for example adigital connection via known Bluetooth technology. Thereafter, throughits network service provider, the mobile device can establish a networkconnection (through the Internet for example) with a server 150. Assuch, a “mobile” network connection can be established between thenavigation device 200 (which can be, and often times is, mobile as ittravels alone and/or in a vehicle) and the server 150 to provide a“real-time” or at least very “up to date” gateway for information.

The establishing of the network connection between the mobile device(via a service provider) and another device such as the server 150,using the Internet for example, can be done in a known manner. In thisrespect, any number of appropriate data communications protocols can beemployed, for example the TCP/IP layered protocol. Furthermore, themobile device can utilize any number of communication standards such asCDMA2000, GSM, IEEE 802.11 a/b/c/g/n, etc.

Hence, it can be seen that the Internet connection may be utilised,which can be achieved via data connection, via a mobile phone or mobilephone technology within the navigation device 200 for example.

Although not shown, the navigation device 200 may, of course, includeits own mobile telephone technology within the navigation device 200itself (including an antenna for example, or optionally using theinternal antenna of the navigation device 200). The mobile phonetechnology within the navigation device 200 can include internalcomponents, and/or can include an insertable card (e.g. SubscriberIdentity Module (SIM) card), complete with necessary mobile phonetechnology and/or an antenna for example. As such, mobile phonetechnology within the navigation device 200 can similarly establish anetwork connection between the navigation device 200 and the server 150,via the Internet for example, in a manner similar to that of any mobiledevice.

For telephone settings, a Bluetooth enabled navigation device may beused to work correctly with the ever changing spectrum of mobile phonemodels, manufacturers, etc., model/manufacturer specific settings may bestored on the navigation device 200 for example. The data stored forthis information can be updated.

In FIG. 2, the navigation device 200 is depicted as being incommunication with the server 150 via a generic communications channel152 that can be implemented by any of a number of differentarrangements. The communication channel 152 generically represents thepropagating medium or path that connects the navigation device 200 andthe server 150. The server 150 and the navigation device 200 cancommunicate when a connection via the communications channel 152 isestablished between the server 150 and the navigation device 200 (notingthat such a connection can be a data connection via mobile device, adirect connection via personal computer via the Internet, etc.).

The communication channel 152 is not limited to a particularcommunication technology. Additionally, the communication channel 152 isnot limited to a single communication technology; that is, the channel152 may include several communication links that use a variety oftechnology. For example, the communication channel 152 can be adapted toprovide a path for electrical, optical, and/or electromagneticcommunications, etc. As such, the communication channel 152 includes,but is not limited to, one or a combination of the following: electriccircuits, electrical conductors such as wires and coaxial cables, fibreoptic cables, converters, radio-frequency (RF) waves, the atmosphere,free space, etc. Furthermore, the communication channel 152 can includeintermediate devices such as routers, repeaters, buffers, transmitters,and receivers, for example.

In one illustrative arrangement, the communication channel 152 includestelephone and computer networks. Furthermore, the communication channel152 may be capable of accommodating wireless communication, for example,infrared communications, radio frequency communications, such asmicrowave frequency communications, etc. Additionally, the communicationchannel 152 can accommodate satellite communication.

The communication signals transmitted through the communication channel152 include, but are not limited to, signals as may be required ordesired for given communication technology. For example, the signals maybe adapted to be used in cellular communication technology such as TimeDivision Multiple Access (TDMA), Frequency Division Multiple Access(FDMA), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), Global System for MobileCommunications (GSM), General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), etc. Bothdigital and analogue signals can be transmitted through thecommunication channel 152. These signals may be modulated, encryptedand/or compressed signals as may be desirable for the communicationtechnology.

The server 150 includes, in addition to other components which may notbe illustrated, a processor 154 operatively connected to a memory 156and further operatively connected, via a wired or wireless connection158, to a mass data storage device 160. The mass storage device 160contains a store of navigation data and map information, and can againbe a separate device from the server 150 or can be incorporated into theserver 150. The processor 154 is further operatively connected totransmitter 162 and receiver 164, to transmit and receive information toand from navigation device 200 via communications channel 152. Thesignals sent and received may include data, communication, and/or otherpropagated signals. The transmitter 162 and receiver 164 may be selectedor designed according to the communications requirement andcommunication technology used in the communication design for thenavigation system 200. Further, it should be noted that the functions oftransmitter 162 and receiver 164 may be combined into a singletransceiver.

As mentioned above, the navigation device 200 can be arranged tocommunicate with the server 150 through communications channel 152,using transmitter 166 and receiver 168 to send and receive signalsand/or data through the communications channel 152, noting that thesedevices can further be used to communicate with devices other thanserver 150. Further, the transmitter 166 and receiver 168 are selectedor designed according to communication requirements and communicationtechnology used in the communication design for the navigation device200 and the functions of the transmitter 166 and receiver 168 may becombined into a single transceiver as described above in relation toFIG. 2. Of course, the navigation device 200 comprises other hardwareand/or functional parts, which will be described later herein in furtherdetail.

Software stored in server memory 156 provides instructions for theprocessor 154 and allows the server 150 to provide services to thenavigation device 200. One service provided by the server 150 involvesprocessing requests from the navigation device 200 and transmittingnavigation data from the mass data storage 160 to the navigation device200. Another service that can be provided by the server 150 includesprocessing the navigation data using various algorithms for a desiredapplication and sending the results of these calculations to thenavigation device 200.

The server 150 constitutes a remote source of data accessible by thenavigation device 200 via a wireless channel. The server 150 may includea network server located on a local area network (LAN), wide areanetwork (WAN), virtual private network (VPN), etc.

The server 150 may include a personal computer such as a desktop orlaptop computer, and the communication channel 152 may be a cableconnected between the personal computer and the navigation device 200.Alternatively, a personal computer may be connected between thenavigation device 200 and the server 150 to establish an Internetconnection between the server 150 and the navigation device 200.

The navigation device 200 may be provided with information from theserver 150 via information downloads which may be updated automatically,from time to time, or upon a user connecting the navigation device 200to the server 150 and/or may be more dynamic upon a more constant orfrequent connection being made between the server 150 and navigationdevice 200 via a wireless mobile connection device and TCP/IP connectionfor example. For many dynamic calculations, the processor 154 in theserver 150 may be used to handle the bulk of processing needs, however,a processor (not shown in FIG. 2) of the navigation device 200 can alsohandle much processing and calculation, oftentimes independent of aconnection to a server 150.

Referring to FIG. 3, it should be noted that the block diagram of thenavigation device 200 is not inclusive of all components of thenavigation device, but is only representative of many examplecomponents. The navigation device 200 is located within a housing (notshown). The navigation device 200 includes processing circuitrycomprising, for example, the processor 202 mentioned above, theprocessor 202 being coupled to an input device 204 and a display device,for example a display screen 206. Although reference is made here to theinput device 204 in the singular, the skilled person should appreciatethat the input device 204 represents any number of input devices,including a keyboard device, voice input device, touch panel and/or anyother known input device utilised to input information. Likewise, thedisplay screen 206 can include any type of display screen such as aLiquid Crystal Display (LCD), for example.

In one arrangement, one aspect of the input device 204, the touch panel,and the display screen 206 are integrated so as to provide an integratedinput and display device, including a touchpad or touchscreen input 250(FIG. 4) to enable both input of information (via direct input, menuselection, etc.) and display of information through the touch panelscreen so that a user need only touch a portion of the display screen206 to select one of a plurality of display choices or to activate oneof a plurality of virtual or “soft” buttons. In this respect, theprocessor 202 supports a Graphical User Interface (GUI) that operates inconjunction with the touchscreen.

In the navigation device 200, the processor 202 is operatively connectedto and capable of receiving input information from input device 204 viaa connection 210, and operatively connected to at least one of thedisplay screen 206 and the output device 208, via respective outputconnections 212, to output information thereto. The navigation device200 may include an output device 208, for example an audible outputdevice (e.g. a loudspeaker). As the output device 208 can produceaudible information for a user of the navigation device 200, it shouldequally be understood that input device 204 can include a microphone andsoftware for receiving input voice commands as well. Further, thenavigation device 200 can also include any additional input device 204and/or any additional output device, such as audio input/output devicesfor example.

The processor 202 is operatively connected to memory 214 via connection216 and is further adapted to receive/send information from/toinput/output (I/O) ports 218 via connection 220, wherein the I/O port218 is connectible to an I/O device 222 external to the navigationdevice 200. The external I/O device 222 may include, but is not limitedto an external listening device, such as an earpiece for example. Theconnection to 110 device 222 can further be a wired or wirelessconnection to any other external device such as a car stereo unit forhands-free operation and/or for voice activated operation for example,for connection to an earpiece or headphones, and/or for connection to amobile telephone for example, wherein the mobile telephone connectioncan be used to establish a data connection between the navigation device200 and the Internet or any other network for example, and/or toestablish a connection to a server via the Internet or some othernetwork for example.

The memory 214 of the navigation device 200 comprises a portion ofnon-volatile memory (for example to store program code) and a portion ofvolatile memory (for example to store data as the program code isexecuted). The navigation device also comprises a port 228, whichcommunicates with the processor 202 via connection 230, to allow aremovable memory card (commonly referred to as a card) to be added tothe device 200. In the embodiment being described the port is arrangedto allow an SD (Secure Digital) card to be added. In other embodiments,the port may allow other formats of memory to be connected (such asCompact Flash (CF) cards, Memory Sticks™, xD memory cards, USB(Universal Serial Bus) Flash drives, MMC (MultiMedia) cards, SmartMediacards, Microdrives, or the like).

FIG. 3 further illustrates an operative connection between the processor202 and an antenna/receiver 224 via connection 226, wherein theantenna/receiver 224 can be a GPS antenna/receiver for example and assuch would function as the GPS receiver 106 of FIG. 1. It should beunderstood that the antenna and receiver designated by reference numeral224 are combined schematically for illustration, but that the antennaand receiver may be separately located components, and that the antennamay be a GPS patch antenna or helical antenna for example.

It will, of course, be understood by one of ordinary skill in the artthat the electronic components shown in FIG. 3 are powered by one ormore power sources (not shown) in a conventional manner. Such powersources may include an internal battery and/or a input for a low voltageDC supply or any other suitable arrangement. As will be understood byone of ordinary skill in the art, different configurations of thecomponents shown in FIG. 3 are contemplated. For example, the componentsshown in FIG. 3 may be in communication with one another via wiredand/or wireless connections and the like. Thus, the navigation device200 described herein can be a portable or handheld navigation device200.

In addition, the portable or handheld navigation device 200 of FIG. 3can be connected or “docked” in a known manner to a vehicle such as abicycle, a motorbike, a car or a boat for example. Such a navigationdevice 200 is then removable from the docked location for portable orhandheld navigation use. Indeed, in other embodiments, the device 200may be arranged to be handheld to allow for navigation of a user.

Referring to FIG. 4, the navigation device 200 may be a unit thatincludes the integrated input and display device 206 and the othercomponents of FIG. 2 (including, but not limited to, the internal GPSreceiver 224, the processor 202, a power supply (not shown), memorysystems 214, etc.).

The navigation device 200 may sit on an arm 252, which itself may besecured to a vehicle dashboard/window/etc. using a suction cup 254. Thisarm 252 is one example of a docking station to which the navigationdevice 200 can be docked. The navigation device 200 can be docked orotherwise connected to the arm 252 of the docking station by snapconnecting the navigation device 200 to the arm 252 for example. Thenavigation device 200 may then be rotatable on the arm 252. To releasethe connection between the navigation device 200 and the dockingstation, a button (not shown) on the navigation device 200 may bepressed, for example. Other equally suitable arrangements for couplingand decoupling the navigation device 200 to a docking station are wellknown to persons of ordinary skill in the art.

Turning to FIG. 5, the processor 202 and memory 214 cooperate to supporta BIOS (Basic Input/Output System) 282 that functions as an interfacebetween functional hardware components 280 of the navigation device 200and the software executed by the device. The processor 202 then loads anoperating system 284 from the memory 214, which provides an environmentin which application software 286 (implementing some or all of thedescribed route planning and navigation functionality) can run. Theapplication software 286 provides an operational environment includingthe Graphical User Interface (GUI) that supports core functions of thenavigation device, for example map viewing, route planning, navigationfunctions and any other functions associated therewith. In this respect,part of the application software 286 comprises a view generation module288.

In the embodiment being described, the processor 202 of the navigationdevice is programmed to receive GPS data received by the antenna 224and, from time to time, to store that GPS data, together with a timestamp of when the GPS data was received, within the memory 214 to buildup a record of the location of the navigation device. Each data recordso-stored may be thought of as a GPS fix; ie it is a fix of the locationof the navigation device and comprises a latitude, a longitude, a timestamp and an accuracy report.

In one embodiment the data is stored substantially on a periodic basiswhich is for example every 5 seconds. The skilled person will appreciatethat other periods would be possible and that there is a balance betweendata resolution and memory capacity; ie as the resolution of the data isincreased by taking more samples, more memory is required to hold thedata. However, in other embodiments, the resolution might besubstantially every: 1 second, 10 seconds, 15 seconds, 20 seconds, 30seconds, 45 seconds, 1 minute, 2.5 minutes (or indeed, any period inbetween these periods). Thus, within the memory of the device there isbuilt up a record of the whereabouts of the device 200 at points intime.

In some embodiments, it may be found that the quality of the captureddata reduces as the period increases and whilst the degree ofdegradation will at least in part be dependent upon the speed at whichthe navigation device 200 was moving a period of roughly 15 seconds mayprovide a suitable upper limit.

Whilst the navigation device 200 is generally arranged to build up arecord of its whereabouts, some embodiments, do not record data for apredetermined period and/or distance at the start or end of a journey.Such an arrangement helps to protect the privacy of the user of thenavigation device 200 since it is likely to protect the location ofhis/her home and other frequented destinations. For example, thenavigation device 200 may be arranged not to store data for roughly thefirst 5 minutes of a journey and/or for roughly the first mile of ajourney.

In other embodiments, the GPS may not be stored on a periodic basis butmay be stored within the memory when a predetermined event occurs. Forexample, the processor 202 may be programmed to store the GPS data whenthe device passes a road junction, a change of road segment, or othersuch event.

Further, the processor 202 is arranged, from time to time, to upload therecord of the whereabouts of the device 200 (ie the GPS data and thetime stamp) to the server 150. In some embodiments in which thenavigation device 200 has a permanent, or at least generally present,communication channel 152 connecting it to the server 150 the uploadingof the data occurs on a periodic basis which may for example be onceevery 24 hours. The skilled person will appreciate that other periodsare possible and may be substantially any of the following periods: 15minutes, 30 minutes, hourly, every 2 hours, every 5 hours, every 12hours, every 2 days, weekly, or any time in between these. Indeed, insuch embodiments the processor 202 may be arranged to upload the recordof the whereabouts on a substantially real time basis, although this mayinevitably mean that data is in fact transmitted from time to time witha relatively short period between the transmissions and as such may bemore correctly thought of as being pseudo real time. In such pseudo realtime embodiments, the navigation device may be arranged to buffer theGPS fixes within the memory 214 and/or on a card inserted in the port228 and to transmit these when a predetermined number have been stored.This predetermined number may be on the order of 20, 36, 100, 200 or anynumber in between. The skilled person will appreciate that thepredetermined number is in part governed by the size of the memory214/card within the port 228.

In other embodiments, which do not have a generally presentcommunication channel 152 the processor 202 may be arranged to uploadthe record to the server 152 when a communication channel 152 iscreated. This may for example, be when the navigation device 200 isconnected to a user's computer. Again, in such embodiments, thenavigation device may be arranged to buffer the GPS fixes within thememory 214 or on a card inserted in the port 228. Should the memory 214or card inserted in the port 228 become full of GPS fixes the navigationdevice may be arranged to deleted the oldest GPS fixes and as such itmay be thought of as a First in First Out (FIFO) buffer.

In the embodiment being described, the record of the whereaboutscomprises one or more traces with each trace representing the movementof that navigation device 200 within a 24 hour period. Each 24 isarranged to coincide with a calendar day but in other embodiments, thisneed not be the case.

Generally, a user of a navigation device 200 gives his/her consent forthe record of the devices whereabouts to be uploaded to the server 150.If no consent is given then no record is uploaded to the server 150. Thenavigation device itself, and/or a computer to which the navigationdevice is connected may be arranged to ask the user for his/her consentto such use of the record of whereabouts.

The server 150 is arranged to receive the record of the whereabouts ofthe device and to store this within the mass data storage 160 forprocessing. Thus, as time passes the mass data storage 160 accumulates aplurality of records of the whereabouts of navigation devices 200 whichhave uploaded data.

As discussed above, the mass data storage 160 also contains map data.Such map data provides information about the location of road segments,points of interest and other such information that is generally found onmap.

As a first process, the server 150 is arranged to perform a map matchingfunction between the map data and the GPS fixes contained within therecords of the whereabouts that have been received and such a process isdescribed in relation to FIG. 6. Such map matching may be performed in aso-called real time manner; ie as the records of whereabouts arereceived or may be performed a time later after the records of thewhereabouts have been recalled from the mass data storage 160.

In order to increase the accuracy of the map matching, pre-processing ofthe records of the whereabouts is performed as follows. Each GPS trace(ie a 24 hour period of GPS data) is divided 600 into one or more tripswith each trip representing a single journey of the navigation device200 which are subsequently stored for later processing.

Within each trip GPS fixes whose accuracy report received from thenavigation device is not sufficiently high are rejected 602. Thus, insome embodiments, a fix may be rejected if the accuracy report indicatesthat the signals from less than three satellites 102 were being receivedby the navigation device 200 in relation to that GPS fix. Further, eachtrip is clipped 604 when the reported time between fixes goes above athreshold value. Each trip that passes this pre-processing stage ispassed to be map matched.

In this context, a clipped trip is a trip in which the there is a timeperiod between consecutive GPS fixes of greater than a predeterminedtime. As such, it might be inferred that the vehicle has remainedstationary and as such it should be considered a first trip has endedand a second trip has commenced. Thus, a clipped trip becomes twoseparate trips.

However, before a trip is divided a check is made as to whether theposition of the vehicle has changed between the last two fixes since agap above the predetermined time between GPS fixes may also result froma loss of GPS signal and in such circumstances, the trip is not divided.In the embodiment being described, the predetermined time is roughly 3minutes. However, the skilled person will appreciate that the gap may beany other suitable time, such as roughly any of the following: 15seconds, 30 seconds, 1 minute, 90 seconds, 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 10minutes or any time in between these. As discussed hereinafter, if theaverage speed of a navigation device 200 from which the GPS fixes aresent is below a predetermined threshold then data, may in someembodiments, be rejected in later processing. Such an embodiment can beuseful in that it can remove data relating to so-called stop-starttraffic which occurs after incidents such as a crash or the like whichmay leave remaining data more representative of steady state trafficflow.

Then, each trip is taken in turn and fixes within that trip are matchedto a map from within the map data. Each map comprises a plurality ofroad segments along which it is possible to travel with each segmentbeing represented within the map as a straight vector.

The program code running on the processor 154 of the server 150 providesa map matcher that is arranged to step over the or each fix in the tripthat is being processed until it finds a fix which lies within a segmentor is sufficiently close to a segment in order for it to be assumed tohave occurred on that segment (ie it is within a distance threshold ofthe segment). This threshold allows for less than 100% GPS accuracy andthe compressing effect of splitting the road into a set of straightvectors.

Each trip has an initial fix (ie the first fix within the trip) which isharder to associate with a segment than other fixes within the tripsince there are no segments that have already identified which can beused to constrain the selection of the segments. If, for this first fix,multiple segments are within the threshold 606, then the algorithm looksto the next GPS fix (ie the 2nd fix) within the trip and generates a setof roots from those multiple segments based on the possible travel as afunction of the distance between the 2 fixes (ie between the 1st and 2ndfixes). If the 2nd fix does not lead to a unique candidate segment forthe 1st fix, then the algorithm moves to the 3rd fix within the trip andagain generates and compares the possible routes to try and provide aunique candidate for the first fix 608. This process may continue untilthe remaining GPS fixes within a trip have been processed.

An advantage of such an embodiment is that although any one first fix inisolation may be near multiple segments, and in isolation these segmentscan not be distinguished between, it becomes possible using the furthertravel (ie the 2nd and 3rd fixes) to determine the identity of thesegment with which the first fix is associated. Thus, a first segmentfor a trip is determined by the map matcher.

Once the first segment has been identified for a trip, further fixes areprocessed in order to identify further segments. It is of coursepossible that the next fix of the trip lies within the same segment asthe first fix 612.

Thus, the subsequent fixes of a trip are processed 610 to determine ifthey are within the distance threshold of the segment, and the mapmatcher is arranged to associate that segment with each of the fixesthat lie within the distance threshold. When the map matcher process afix that is outwith the distance threshold it is arranged to generate anew set of candidate segments for that fix. However, it is now possibleto add a further constraint that the next segment is one which isconnected to the end of the one which has just been processed. Theseneighbouring segments are obtained by the map matcher from theunderlying map data. If at any point the map matcher fails to identify asegment for a given fix that follows on from the previous segment,either because there are no segments within a threshold, or it cannotuniquely identify a single segment, then the map matcher is arranged tostep through subsequent fixes 616 in order to further constrain thejourney until it can identify a segment that is a unique match. That is,if the nth fix cannot be uniquely associated with a segment the nth+1segment is used to further constrain the identification of a segment. Ifthe nth+1 fix does not produce a unique segment then the nth+2 fix isused. In some embodiments, this process may carry on until the a uniquesegment is identified or all of the GPS fixes with a trip have beenprocessed.

The map matcher is arranged to try and uniquely identify segments; inthe embodiment being described, it does not attempt to create acontinuous route, only to try and match segments to fixes. In otherembodiments, it may be desirable to try and have the map matchergenerate continuous routes.

Therefore, at the end of the process that the map matcher is arranged toperform, a series of road segments are obtained along which thenavigation device 200 has travelled in the trip being analysed.Subsequently, the map matcher further processes these road segments andassigns, from the GPS fixes, an ingress time and also a transit time forthat segment. These assigned times are stored within the mass datastorage 160 for later processing. It may well be that a plurality of GPSfixes are stored for each road segment. However, regardless of whetherhow many GPS fixes are associated with each segment, the ingress time,GPS fixes and the length of the segment (which in this embodiment isstored within the map data) are used to calculate the average speed forthat segment of road. This average speed is then stored within the massdata storage 160 associated with the relevant assigned times and thatsegment. Information relating to a speed of traffic flow on a roadsegment and assigned to a road segment may be thought of as being speeddata for that road segment.

The server 150 is further arranged to run averaging program code on theprocessor 154 to provide an averager which processes the assigned timesto generate one or more averages therefrom as described below. Theaveraging process used in this embodiment is now described in relationto FIG. 7.

In a first step of the process 700, the averager groups the averagespeeds for each road segment on the map being processed. Within thegrouping for each road segment, the averager is further arranged togroup the average speeds within a set of predetermined time periods 702.Thus, average speeds which occur within the same time period (eg between8.00 am and 8.59 am) are grouped together for further analysis. In theembodiment being described, the time periods are one hour durations butthis need not be the case and the skilled person will appreciate, fromthe following description, that as the length of the time perioddecreases the resolution of the data is increased but storagerequirements are increased. Other suitable time periods mightsubstantially any of the following: 1 minute, 5 minute, 10 minute, 15minute, 30 min, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, or any time in between thesetimes.

In the embodiment being described, average speeds are stored in a timelocal to the area covered by the map being processed rather than acentralised time. Such a method is convenient as it provides a naturalbasis for traffic related issues.

Before an average speed generated from a trip is grouped into apredetermined time period it is screened to try and increase dataquality. In this embodiment, the average speed is only added to thegroup for the predetermined period if the average speed falls within apredetermined range. In this embodiment, the method excludes speedswhich exceed a maximum predetermined threshold (which may be roughly 180km/h) and further, the method excludes speeds which fall below apredetermined amount of the average speed for that segment in thatpredetermined time period (which may for example be 2 km/h). The skilledperson will appreciate that speeds which are well below the averagespeed for that segment in that time may well be associated with aproblem in the traffic flow for that segment, such as a traffic jam orthe like. Thus, including data relating to such conditions may reducethe overall accuracy of the data when considering the road in normalconditions. In other embodiments, the max permitted speed may be set asthe speed limit for that segment of road, but the skilled person willappreciate that such information can be inaccurate in map data that isbeing processed and also that the speed limit for a segment of road mayin fact not give an accurate indication of traffic conditions.

Once grouping into the predetermined time periods has been performed anaverage speed is calculated for each road segment for each predeterminedtime period. For example, all of the speeds within the 8.00 am to 8.59am time period, for each segment of road are averaged. There are severaloptions for computing the average speed: using plain arithmetic orharmonic means or computing the median. Indeed, in some embodiments,different weights may be used for the data sets according to the laterintended use of the data.

Thus, in the embodiment being described and for the map being processedthere is generated for each segment of road on the map 24 averagespeeds; an average speed for each hour long predetermined time period.It will be appreciated that if a different duration of time period isused then there will be a different number of average speeds. It will befurther appreciated that, in fact, not all road segments willnecessarily have an average speed assigned thereto for every time periodsince some roads may be traversed infrequently, particularly atunsociable times such as the early hours of the morning.

However, before further the average speeds per segment are used qualitychecks are performed 706. In this embodiment, this check ensures thatmore than a predetermined number of assigned times were used to generateaverage speed per segment. If this is not the case then that averagespeed per segment is rejected for further processing leaving a gap forthat segment at one or more time periods. In some embodiments, theaverage is rejected if there are fewer than 5 values that went to makeup that average. Other embodiments, may of course use different values,such as 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 20 or more or any value in between these.

Also, a further check on the quality of the average is performed and foreach average the standard deviation of the average is divided by thesquare root of the number of data samples that went to make up theaverage for that segment for that time period. If the result of thiscalculation is outside a predetermined threshold then that average isagain rejected leaving a gap for that segment for that time period.

Further quality checks may be implemented to reject averages on any ofthe following: whether the deviation in the data is beyond apredetermined threshold; the existence of more than a predeterminednumber of outliers beyond a predetermined threshold. The skilled personwill appreciate such statistical techniques to ensure the quality of thedata.

The set of averages for any given road segment may be thought of as ameasured speed profile for that road segment.

The skilled person will appreciate that if a measured speed profile fora road segment has few missing speed values (ie all or at least themajority of the predetermined time periods have a value) then thatsegment may be processed and the missing values are therefore masked. Asthe number of missing segments increases then the quality of theresulting cluster analysis is reduced. Thus, just how many missing timeperiods are allowed is a matter of a quality decision and has to beexamined from case to case. Using only high-quality, complete data mayimply too much weight to road segments with high coverage (ie fewmissing time periods) which normally comprises highways, motorways andother roads along which many people travel. Too low a requirement (ieclustering road segments that have too many missing time periods) leadsto unrealistic clusters and inaccurate analysis.

Each average that passes these quality checks is considered trustworthyand is approved for use in further processing. In step 708 an assessmentis made as to the overall coverage of average speeds per road segment.If the coverage of trustworthy averages is high enough then the map datais forwarded for further processing. However, if the coverage is below apredetermined threshold then the map is rejected from furtherconsideration 710. Acceptable maps are passed for cluster formation asis described in relation to FIG. 8.

Such cluster formation aims to extract regular speed profiles in anautomatic or semi-automatic manner; as will be discussed later, datacompression, which may be significant, can be achieved if it is assumedthat roads of a similar class may have a similar speed profile. Forexample, the speed at 10 am on a Sunday morning for a first segment ofroad may be similar to the speed at the same time for a second segmentof road. If this similarity for those segments of road is repeated forother times then the speed profile for the first and second segments maybe considered to be represented by the same speed profile of the secondsegment. The clustering as now defined aims to locate such similarities.Normalisation of speed profiles, as discussed below, may also allow aspeed profile to be used for roads of a different class.

Before the clustering is performed, the measured speed profile isfurther processed in order to amalgamate the night-time time periods. Inthis embodiment, the average speeds between 9 pm and 5 am (ie 8 timeperiods) are averaged and this night-time average is used for each of 8time periods; that is the measured speed profile is modified to replacea portion thereof with modified values for the average speeds for one ormore predetermined time periods which comprises using an average of thespeed averages to be replaced as the modified value for each of thepredetermined time periods. Thus, each speed profile has a flat speedprofile between the hours of 9 pm and 8 am which may be termed the freeflow speed of that road segment. It may be assumed that the free flowspeed represents the speed at which a vehicle, generally a car, travelsalong the road and it is often the case that the free flow speed isdifferent from the speed limit for that road segment. The free flowspeed may also be roughly the same as the speed limit for that roadsegment.

In a first step 800 and in order to limit the number of clusters themeasured speed profiles are normalised between predetermined parameters.Such normalisation can be performed according to a number of criteria.In the embodiment being described, normalisation occurs according to thefree flow speed that has been calculated for the segment of road withwhich the average is associated. As such, the average speed per roadsegment that is passed to the clustering algorithm has a value ofbetween 0 and 1. Thus, in this embodiment, the predetermined parametersare 0 and 1. The skilled person will appreciate that other parametersare possible. Such a method can aid further data compression since itcan make the resulting cluster-generated speed profile independent ofthe type of road and as such it becomes possible to use the same set ofspeed profiles for road segments having any road type. The clustergenerated speed profiles may also be thought of as generated speedprofiles.

Use of the free-flow speeds during the night time period may reduce thedimension of the cluster formation since it may be possible to neglectnight time speed values.

In yet further embodiments, the average speed or the speed limit of aroad segment may be used as a further criteria against which to performthe normalisation.

Thus, days showing a similar traffic behavior can be grouped together byprocessing by a clustering algorithm. If the expected traffic behavioris different the cluster formation should run independently. An inputparameter to the clustering algorithm is the number of desired clustersand a typical range is 10-70 for a day of the week. There are knownmethods to approach the optimal number of clusters (e.g. having somequality measures assigned and enlarging/reducing the numbers of clustersaccording to its trend) which may be used to determine whether theoutput of the clustering is acceptable.

In one embodiment, the clustering algorithm is run and arranged togenerate around 60 clusters. In other embodiments, the algorithm may bearranged to generate more or less clusters initially. The resultantclusters are then processed to determine whether the generated clustersare satisfactory: are some of the clusters too similar (ie substantiallythe same)? Do any of the clusters have discontinuities therein? If thereare problems with any of the clusters then the algorithm is re-run withthe process aiming to generate fewer clusters than the first iteration.This iterative process is repeated until a satisfactory set of clustersis determined.

In some embodiments, whether the clusters are satisfactory includes astep of determining whether or not any of the cluster-generated profilescontain frequencies above a predetermined threshold. The presence ofsuch frequencies indicates that that cluster-generated speed profile hasa rate of change that is too high (ie there may be a discontinuity) andif used may result in instability, etc. within a navigation device 200using that data to generate a route.

Whether or not the clusters are satisfactory may also include the stepof performing a comparison between at least some, and generally each, ofthe cluster-generated speed profiles. In one particular embodiment thismay be performed by a least squares comparison.

In one embodiment the cluster is performed by cluster analysis, butother class building methods might be used as well. A simple andefficient approach is the so-called k-means clustering algorithm. Thisnon-hierarchical method normally starts with k random seeds andredistributes the class members according to a minimum error criteriabased on a chosen metric. The algorithm leads to local minima only,therefore for an optimal solution it has to run multiple times. The runwith the minimum error estimates gives what may be a preferred solution.The centroids of the final clusters form the predefined clusters. Inother embodiments other clustering techniques may be used and theseinclude hierarchical clustering and fuzzy clustering.

Some embodiments, may add further clusters 804. For example, someembodiments may add a flat line as a speed profile for road segmentsthat have no trustworthy trend, e.g. due to low data coverage or becauseof traffic related issues.

As a final step 806 in the preparation of the cluster generated speedprofiles, the clusters are interpolated to a variable time resolution.In one embodiment this is performed using cubic splines but othertechniques are possible such as an exponential fitting function. Theskilled person will also appreciate similar techniques that may be used.

Even if the time resolution used in the cluster analysis procedureitself is coarser than is finally desired, which may occur in order thatthere are a sufficient number of reliable average speed in any onepredetermined time period, the time resolution can now be modified. Forexample, it can be modified to finer resolution to meet the requirementsof the intended use. For example, it can be advantageous to have a finerresolution having a more continuous profile in place is desired toprovide smoother routes which might otherwise “jump” on time boundariesif the time resolution is too coarse. In the embodiment being described,the cluster-generated profiles are interpolated in order that they havea resolution of roughly 5 min intervals, although any other period maybe used. Such a period may be convenient for later processing using thecluster-generated speed profile.

FIG. 9 shows a typical output from the clustering algorithm for a map inwhich the input average speed values have been clustered into 16independent cluster generated speed profiles. Thus, for that map eachsection of road can now be referred to as having one of the 16 clustergenerated speed profiles. If in other embodiments, the number ofclusters is varied then the number of possible speed profiles for anyone segment of road is also changed.

Once, a suitable set of cluster generated speed profiles has beendetermined—in this embodiment 16 have been generated—then these areassociated with one or more maps. Generally, a set of speed profileswill be more accurate for the map from which they have been generatedsince traffic behavior may be different on roads not on that map. Forexample, should a map cover a single country then it may be that trafficin a different country follows slightly different patterns.

However, in other embodiments, the speed profiles may be associated witha plurality of maps. In one example, this may be appropriate if the amap covers a portion of a country and/or it may be appropriate to usethe map for a plurality of countries.

Each road segment that is present on the map being processed is analysedand may have one of the cluster generated speed profiles (as shown inFIG. 9) associated therewith and this process is described in relationto FIG. 12. Starting with n=1, the nth road segment is processed 1200.

Reference is made herein to speed data being associated with a roadsegment. The skilled person will appreciate that each road segment isrepresented by data within the map data providing the map. In someembodiments, such data representing the road segment may include anidentifier which provides a reference to the speed data. For example thereference may provide a reference to a generated speed profile.

It will be appreciated that in order that PND's using the map beingprocessed can generate accurate routes, it is desirable that each roadsegment has a speed profile associated therewith in which there is ahigh degree of belief (as a first step this is assessed on whether themeasured speed profile is suitable). Thus, if the quality assessmentmade earlier has determined that the measured speed profile does notmeet the quality criteria then a fall back strategy is used to replacethe measured speed profile with speed data which is likely to provebetter for routing purposed when processed by a PND or other device.

Should it be determined that the measured speed profile is in factunsuitable then as a first fall back position an average speed 1000 forthe road segment being processed which comprises an average of all thespeed data collected for that road segment is used instead of themeasured speed profile. That is the data collected for each time periodfor each day is averaged to generate a single speed. This single averagespeed may be, in due course, mapped to the flat cluster generated speedprofile (number 15 in FIG. 9). In some embodiments, FIG. 9 may bethought of as showing a set of 15 generated speed profiles, each varyingwith respect to time, to which a 16th, roughly flat, generated speedprofile (ie profile number 15 in FIG. 9) has been added which does notvary with respect to time (or at least does not vary substantially withrespect to time).

Next, it should be determined whether the average speed generated fromthe data collected for a segment is acceptable. If the average passesthese checks then the average is used for that road segment.

Again, a person skilled in the art of statistics will appreciatemeasures that may be used to measure the quality of the average. Forexample, in some embodiments, it may be required that the average ismade up from more than a predetermined number of speeds, which may forexample be roughly 10 speeds. Thresholds may be applied to the averagesto ensure that they are above a minimum value (which may for example beroughly 2 km/h) and/or below a maximum value (which may for example beroughly 150 km/h). The standard deviation may may also be used todetermine whether the average is of a high enough quality.

It is known that road segments may be classified according to aclassification system within map data such that roads of similarcharacteristics are classified within the same classification. Forexample, maps generated by one party has 8 categories into which roadsegments are classified. In some embodiments, the average for a givenroad segment is analysed to ensure that at least a predeterminedpercentage of roads within the classification for that road segment haveprovided a speed which has been used to generate the average. If thistest fails then not only is the average rejected, but the gap fillingprocedure described next may also be omitted.

If road segment allow flow of traffic in two directions then there willbe a set of average speeds associated with each direction.

It will be appreciated that should the measured speed profile have beenreplaced during the fall back strategy then there is effectively a speedprofile which comprises a flat line, such as clustered speed profilenumber 15 as shown in FIG. 9. It will be further appreciated thatbecause the speed profile information is normalised then speed profilenumber 15 may be used to represent any road segment having a singleaverage speed associated therewith.

If the average generated from the collected data from that segment stillfails the quality check then the next step 1002 of the fall backstrategy is used and a so-called gap filling process is used which isnow described with the aid of FIG. 11. As a first step each road segmenton the map being processed is categorised as being a member of one of apredetermined number of categories 1100. The skilled person willappreciate that this categorisation of each road segment need only beperformed once and the resulting categorisation maintained for furtherroad segments for which the gap-filling process is invoked. Otherembodiments could of course re-calculate at each invocation or indeedcalculate the categories on the fly.

In the embodiment being described, there are 40 such categories asoutlined in the following table 1. These categories may vary dependingon the map data that is being processed, the area covered by the map, orany other relevant factor.

TABLE 1 Motorways 0 any motorway inside and outside city exceptroundabout, sliproad or parallel road 1 roundabout on motorway insideand outside city 2 sliproad on motorway inside and outside city 3parallel road on motorway inside and outside city International Roads 4any international road outside city except roundabout or sliproad 5 anyinternational road inside city except roundabout or sliproad 6roundabout on international road outside city 7 roundabout oninternational road inside city 8 sliproad on international road outsidecity 9 sliproad on international road inside city Major Roads 10 anymajor roads outside city except roundabout, sliproad or parallel road 11any major roads inside city except roundabout, sliproad or parallel road12 roundabout on major roads outside city 13 roundabout on major roadsinside city 14 sliproad on major roads 15 sliproad on major roads insidecity 16 parallel road on major roads inside and outside city SecondaryRoads 17 any secondary roads outside city except roundabout, sliproad orparallel road 18 any secondary roads inside city except roundabout,sliproad or parallel road 19 roundabout on secondary roads outside city20 roundabout on secondary roads inside city 21 sliproad on secondaryroads outside city 22 sliproad on secondary roads inside city 23parallel road on secondary roads inside and outside city ConnectingRoads 24 any connecting roads outside city except roundabout or sliproad25 any connecting roads inside city except roundabout or sliproad 26roundabout on connecting roads outside city 27 roundabout on connectingroads inside city 28 sliproad on connecting roads outside city 29sliproad on connecting roads inside city Important local Roads 30 anyimportant local roads outside city except roundabout 31 any importantlocal roads inside city except roundabout 32 roundabout on importantlocal roads outside city 33 roundabout on important local inside cityLocal Roads 34 any local roads outside city except roundabout 35 anylocal roads inside city except roundabout 36 roundabout on local roadsoutside city 37 roundabout on local inside city Destination Roads 38 anydestination roads outside city 39 any destination roads inside city

Once each road segment is assigned to a category then a category averagespeed is calculated for each one of the predetermined categories 1102,in this case 40 categories. The category average that is generated is asingle figure per category and in order to achieve this the averagespeed for each predetermined time period is averaged using any suitableaveraging technique as mentioned herein. Again, the skilled person willappreciate that this step may only need to be performed once and thecategory average speed maintained for future invocations of thegap-filling process.

However, in this embodiment, each average speed for a class iscalculated as a length-weighted harmonic mean of all of the elementsbelonging to the class, which is given by the following formula:V _(mean) =L/Σl _(i) /V _(i)

Whereas

V_(mean): mean speed of class j

l_(i): length of line i

L: total length of all lines belonging to the class j (L=Σl_(i))

V_(i): average speed of line i

Before these average speeds can be used further, they are checked toascertain whether they are of a high enough quality such that theyprovide a reliable representation of the average speed for that categoryof road. This might not be the case should there be too few sampleswithin that predetermined time period for that class of road or if thereis too much variance in the samples that have gone to make up aparticular average. Therefore, checks are made as to the quality of eachaverage 1104 as now described.

If an average speed from one of the 40 categories is based on lesssegments than hit_number_min (which are shown, for this embodiment, intable 2 below) then this average is replaced by the value from anothercategory as shown in table 3 below). In the embodiment being describedthe value for the minimum number of hit is ten but these may vary inother embodiments.

If neither quality_factor_abs of a particular category nor thequality_factor_rel of this category is smaller or equal to the valuesshown in table 2, then the average of the speed category is replacedwith the average of the assigned replacement category as shown in table2. It will be seen that quality_factor_rel_min is given by relativestandard deviation of a class in % of the mean speed divided by squareroot of number of hits, quality_factor_abs*100/mean_speed.

Therefore there are three quality factors (quality_factor_abs_min,quality_factor_rel_min, hit_number_min) which are passed before anaverage speed in anyone category can be used. If the quality factors arenot met then the averages speed is replaced according to table 3.

TABLE 2 Default value [range of Parameter value] Descriptionsquality_factor_abs_min 3 Quality factor for data rejection: s/sqrt(n)(absolute speed standard deviation of a class in km/h divided by squareroot of number of hits) quality_factor_rel_min 5 Quality factor forspeed class replacement: s/sqrt(n) (relative standard deviation of aclass in % of the mean speed divided by square root of number of hits,quality_factor_abs * 100/ mean_speed) hit_number_min 10 Minimum numberof required total hits per speed class

TABLE 3 Speed Replacement speed category number category number 1 0 2 03 0 4 10 5 4 6 4 7 5 8 4 9 5 10 11 11 10 12 10 13 11 14 10 15 11 16 1017 18 18 17 19 17 20 18 21 17 22 18 23 17 24 25 25 24 26 24 27 25 28 2429 25 30 31 31 30 32 30 33 31 34 35 35 34 36 34 37 35 38 39 39 38

The values shown in table 2 may well vary in other embodiments and areshown as an example only. Likewise, the replacement values used in table3 may well vary in other embodiments, depending upon the area covered bythe map, the party that generated the map data, etc.

Before one of the averages generated for a category can be used it ischecked to see whether it passes some quality checks. If it does notpass these checks then the gap filling procedure fails for thatcategory. These quality checks are as follows.

The average for the classification should lie above a minimum thresholdand below a maximum threshold which are computed in the following way,with min and max are pseudo code minimum and maximum functions:Min_speed_threshold=max[max(mean-lower_relative_devision*mean/100,mean-lower_absolute_devision),lower_limit]Max_speed_threshold=min[min(mean+upper_relative_devision*mean/100,mean+upper_absolute_devision),upper_limit]

whereas mean is the mean speed of the appropriate speed class of thesegment. The other quantities are defined in Table 4.

If a speed associated with a segment fail these criteria then that speedis replaced by its threshold based on its mean speed unless the speedassociated with the segment does not offend the absolute speed limits inwhich case the absolute speed limits will be used as the speed for thatsegment.

TABLE 4 Default value [range of Parameter value] Descriptionsupper_limit 130 Absolute allowed maximum speed for a segment in km/hlower_limit 5 Absolute allowed minimum speed in km/h for a segmentupper_relative_devision 50 Maximum allowed upper speed deviation for asegment in percent of its class mean upper_absolute_devision 30 Maximumallowed upper absolute speed deviation in km/h for a segment related toits class mean lower_relative_devision 50 Maximum allowed lower speeddeviation for a segment in percent of its class meanlower_absolute_devision 30 Maximum allowed lower absolute speeddeviation in km/h for a segment related to its class mean

The skilled person will appreciate that the calculations are performedon speeds and not upon time data.

Thus, at the end of the gap filling process an average speed may havebeen generated, based upon road segments within the same category fromthe predetermined 40. However, the gap-filling process might still fail(ie no average is generated which passes the quality checks).

Thus, road segments which have no speed data associated with them nowhave an average speed data assigned thereto 1108 which has beengenerated by the gap filling procedure (assuming that average has passedthe quality checks).

Should the gap filling fails then, in step 1004, the speed associatedwith that road segment is set to be the speed that has been provided bythe map data supplier according to Functional Road Class (FRC). Thefunctional road class may for example comprise roughly 8 categories,although this might differ between map data suppliers. That is, the freeflow speed is set to a value according to the FRC and the clustergenerated speed profile is set to be, in this embodiment, profile number15.

Next, the speed profile (whether a measured speed profile or an averageinserted by gap filling) associated with a road segment is now mapped toone of the cluster generated speed profiles to generate the map datawhich can be used by navigation devices such as PND's. This may beperformed regardless of whether the speed information is a measuredspeed profile or an average in view of the presence of the flat clustergenerated speed profile number 15.

In step 1210 the speed profile is compared, using a least squarescomparison, with each of the speed profiles in the set of clustergenerated speed profiles. After these 16 comparisons have been made itis possible to determine which speed profile from the set of 16 isclosest to the speed profile associated with the road segment and instep 1220 a reference to the cluster generated speed profile that isdeemed to be closest is stored in the map data for that road segment.Also stored in the map data in relation to that road segment is the freeflow speed for that road segment which has been calculated earlier.

Thus, using the reference and the free flow speed, information can bestored within the map data which provides information on the averagespeeds for each road segment. For frequently travelled segments theaverage speed information provided may be thought of as comprising anapproximation to the daily hourly average between the hours of 9 am to 5pm. For less travelled segments the average speed data may be thought ofas being an average speed which is averaged across all time periods.

This is repeated 1230 until each of the road segments on the map has hadone of the set of 16 cluster generated speed profiles associatedtherewith.

Before the map data may be released for use a final check is made to seeif a sufficient number of road segments have a measured speed profileassociated with them (as opposed to an average that has been insertedinstead of a measured speed profile). If this check is not passed thenthe whole map is rejected and not released for use.

In this final check, the total length of road segments is calculated foreach Functional Road Class (FRC). The FRC's are related to the 40categories listed in table 2 as shown in table 5 below. The length ofroad segment within each FRC with average speed data assigned theretoshould be above the threshold percentage of the total road length withinthe FRC as shown in table 5.

TABLE 5 FRC (Functional Road Class) Minimum required Description FRClength coverage [%] Motorways 0 60 International roads 1 50 Major roads2 40 Secondary roads 3 30 Connecting roads 4 18 Important local roads 512 Local roads 6 2 Destination roads 7 0

It will be seen that the minimum coverage figures for road categorieswhich in general have more impact on routing behavior are given a higherpercentage requirement when compared to road categories which have alower impact. For example, FRC 0 (Motorways) are required to have 60%because they have a higher impact on routing when compared to, forexample, secondary roads which consequently have a requirement for 30%coverage.

In other embodiments further fall back strategies may be provided. Inone such embodiment, a first fall back strategy (should the measuredspeed profile been deemed unacceptable) may be to aggregate the samepredetermined time periods for each day; ie the predetermined timeperiods are added to that period for each of the other days and then theresulting aggregated speed profile is used for each day rather thanusing a measured speed profile for each separate day. Therefore, in suchan embodiment, a weekly speed profile is generated by adding the sametime periods for each of the days Monday to Friday and a weekend speedprofile is generated by adding the same time periods for each ofSaturday and Sunday. It will be appreciated that traffic flow on theweekend may well be different to traffic flow on week days.

Such aggregated speed profile may then be checked to see if passesquality criteria before using other fall back strategies if it is notacceptable. These checks may be made using the same, or at leastsimilar, criteria to those used to assess the measured speed profiles.If the aggregation of the data has improved the quality so that both theweekly and weekend speed profiles pass the quality check then thesespeed profiles are used for that road segment.

The skilled person will appreciated that an apparatus provided toexecute a method as described herein may comprise hardware, software,firmware or any combination of two or more of these.

The skilled person will appreciate that, whilst the term GPS data hasbeen used to refer to positioning data derived from a GPS globalpositioning system as for example described in relation to FIG. 1. Otherpositioning data could be processed in a manner similar to the methodsas described herein. Thus, term GPS data may be replaceable with thephrase positioning data. Such positioning data, could for example bederived from position data derived from mobile phone operation, datareceived at toll barriers, data obtained from induction loops embeddedin roads, data obtained from number plate recognition system or anyother suitable data.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A computer implemented method of creatingmap data for a map, the map comprising a plurality of navigablesegments, with each navigable segment having speed data associatedtherewith, wherein said speed data comprises a plurality of averagespeeds at which devices travelled along the segment represented by thenavigable segment of the map, and wherein said speed data is groupedinto a plurality of predetermined time periods over a period of time,the method comprising: processing the speed data to determine a measuredspeed profile for each of the plurality of navigable segments, saidprocessing comprising averaging the average speeds within each of theplurality of time periods, such that the measured speed profilecomprises a representation of the variation in traffic speed along thesegment represented by the navigable segment of the map over the periodof time; generating, based on the measured speed profiles, a set ofgenerated speed profiles, the generating comprising processing themeasured speed profiles using a clustering technique to identifysimilarities between the measured speed profiles, wherein each generatedspeed profile of the set of generated speed profiles is a representationof a variation in traffic speed over the period of time that isconfigured to be used to indicate a speed profile of any navigablesegment having a sufficiently close measured speed profile; separatelycomparing the measured speed profile for each of the plurality ofnavigable segments to the set of generated speed profiles to determinewhich of the generated speed profiles is closest to that measured speedprofile; associating, based on the comparing, one of the generated speedprofiles from the set of generated speed profiles with each of theplurality of navigable segments; generating a map using the map data,such that the map comprises the set of generated speed profiles and, foreach navigable segment, an identifier providing a reference to theassociated one of the generated speed profiles; and providing, to aremote device, the map comprising the set of generated speed profilesand the identifiers for each navigable segment that indicate theassociated one of the generated speed profiles.
 2. The method of claim1, which comprises modifying the measured speed profile to replace aportion thereof with modified values for the average speeds for one ormore of the predetermined time periods.
 3. The method of claim 1, inwhich the measured speed profiles are normalised using a normalisationcriteria before the generated speed profiles are generated.
 4. Themethod of claim 3, in which the measured speed profiles are normalisedusing one of: a free flow speed; an average speed; and a speed limit,for the respective navigable segment.
 5. The method of claim 3, in whichthe speed data associated with each segment in the generated map furthercomprises the normalisation criteria.
 6. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising adding at least one flat line speed profile to the set ofgenerated speed profiles, the flat line speed profile not varying withrespect to time.
 7. A machine arranged to create map data for a map, themap comprising a plurality of navigable segments, with each navigablesegment having speed data associated therewith, wherein said speed datacomprises a plurality of average speeds at which devices travelled alongthe segment represented by the navigable segment of the map, and whereinsaid speed data is grouped into a plurality of predetermined timeperiods over a period of time, the machine being arranged to: processthe speed data to determine a measured speed profile for each of theplurality of navigable segments, said processing comprising averagingthe average speeds within each of the plurality of time periods, suchthat the measured speed profile comprises a representation of thevariation in traffic speed along the segment represented by thenavigable segment of the map over the period of time; generate, based onthe measured speed profiles, a set of generated speed profiles, thegenerating comprising processing the measured speed profiles using aclustering technique to identify similarities between the measured speedprofiles, wherein each generated speed profile of the set of generatedspeed profiles is a representation of a variation in traffic speed overthe period of time that is configured to be used to indicate a speedprofile of any navigable segment having a sufficiently close measuredspeed profile; separately compare the measured speed profile for each ofthe plurality of navigable segments to the set of generated speedprofiles to determine which of the generated speed profiles is closestto that measured speed profile; associate, based on the comparing, oneof the generated speed profiles from the set of generated speed profileswith each of the plurality of navigable segments; generate a map usingthe map data, such that the map comprises the set of generated speedprofiles and, for each navigable segment, an identifier providing areference to the associated one of the generated speed profiles; andproviding, to a remote device, the map comprising the set of generatedspeed profiles and the identifiers for each navigable segment thatindicate the associated one of the generated speed profiles.
 8. Amachine readable medium containing instructions which, when processed bya machine, cause the machine to perform a method of creating map datafor a map, the map comprising a plurality of navigable segments, witheach navigable segment having speed data associated therewith, whereinsaid speed data comprises a plurality of average speeds at which devicestravelled along the segment represented by the navigable segment of themap, and wherein said speed data is grouped into a plurality ofpredetermined time periods over a period of time, the method comprising:processing the speed data to determine a measured speed profile for eachof the plurality of navigable segments, said processing comprisingaveraging the average speeds within each of the plurality of timeperiods, such that the measured speed profile comprises a representationof the variation in traffic speed along the segment represented by thenavigable segment of the map over the period of time; generating, basedon the measured speed profiles, a set of generated speed profiles, thegenerating comprising processing the measured speed profiles using aclustering technique to identify similarities between the measured speedprofiles, wherein each generated speed profile of the set of generatedspeed profiles is a representation of a variation in traffic speed overthe period of time that is configured to be used to indicate a speedprofile of any navigable segment having a sufficiently close measuredspeed profile; separately comparing the measured speed profile for eachof the plurality of navigable segments to the set of generated speedprofiles to determine which of the generated speed profiles is closestto that measured speed profile; associating, based on the comparing, oneof the generated speed profiles from the set with each of the pluralityof navigable segments within the map; generating a map using the mapdata, such that the map comprises the set of generated speed profilesand, for each navigable segment, an identifier providing a reference tothe associated one of the generated speed profiles; and providing, to aremote device, the map comprising the set of generated speed profilesand the identifiers for each navigable segment that indicate theassociated one of the generated speed profiles.
 9. The method of claim2, further comprising using an average of the average speeds as themodified value for each of the predetermined time periods within thereplaced portion.
 10. The machine of claim 7, wherein the machine isfurther arranged to modify the measured speed profile to replace aportion thereof with modified values for the average speeds for one ormore of the predetermined time periods.
 11. The machine of claim 10,wherein the machine is further arranged to use an average of the averagespeeds as the modified value for each of the predetermined time periodswithin the replaced portion.
 12. The machine of claim 7, wherein themachine is further arranged to normalise the measured speed profilesusing a normalisation criteria before the generated speed profiles aregenerated.
 13. The machine of claim 12, wherein the measured speedprofiles are normalised using one of: a free flow speed; an averagespeed; and a speed limit, for the respective navigable segment.
 14. Themachine of claim 12, wherein the speed data associated with each segmentin the generated map further comprises the normalisation criteria. 15.The machine of claim 7, wherein the machine is further arranged to addat least one flat line speed profile to the set of generated speedprofiles, the flat line speed profile not varying with respect to time.16. The machine readable medium of claim 8, wherein the method furthercomprises modifying the measured speed profile to replace a portionthereof with modified values for the average speeds for one or more ofthe predetermined time periods.
 17. The machine readable medium of claim16, wherein the method further comprises using an average of the averagespeeds as the modified value for each of the predetermined time periodswithin the replaced portion.
 18. The machine readable medium of claim 8,wherein the method further comprises normalising the measured speedprofiles using a normalisation criteria before the generated speedprofiles are generated.
 19. The machine readable medium of claim 18,wherein the measured speed profiles are normalised using one of: a freeflow speed; an average speed; and a speed limit, for the respectivenavigable segment.
 20. The machine readable medium of claim 18, whereinthe speed data associated with each segment in the generated map furthercomprises the normalisation criteria.
 21. The machine readable medium ofclaim 8, wherein the method further comprises adding at least one flatline speed profile to the set of generated speed profiles, the flat linespeed profile not varying with respect to time.